Using a "big-name" monitoring solution

Applying eValid to Rich Internet Application (RIA) Performance Monitoring.

Using a "big-name" monitoring solution

Postby hJon » Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm

We're using a "big-name" monitoring solution that is based on HTTP tests of our website, and our new application runs AJAX and now the monitoring doesn't work. Do we have to give up our "big-name" reporting solution to get a benefit from eValid?
hJon
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:11 pm

Re: Using a "big-name" monitoring solution

Postby eValid » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:13 am

hJon wrote:We're using a "big-name" monitoring solution that is based on HTTP tests of our website, and our new application runs AJAX and now the monitoring doesn't work. Do we have to give up our "big-name" reporting solution to get a benefit from eValid?
No, there's no reason to give up the "big-name" monitoring solution. You probably are used to how it works
and how it appears, so keeping it running is a good thing.

What we usually recommend, when the old HTTP-based systems begin to fail because the applications have switched to AJAX, is to use eValid agents to collect the required performance data -- and issue performance alerts via email or text messages -- and graft the data into the existing reporting scheme.

We've done this for a variety of different reporting systems, ranging from the open source solutions (like GWOS) to the one from the "big-name" firm you're dealing with. We're sure we can do it with your system.

eValid runs perfectly reliably from an windows machine -- including one that is running in the clout -- and feeds data about how AJAX applications perform that you can't measure any other way.

eValid Monitoring Team
eValid
 
Posts: 1854
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:48 pm
Location: USA


Return to Rich Internet Application Monitoring (RIA)

Design Downloaded from free phpBB templates | free website templates | Free Web Buttons