Which costs more? Groundwork, WebInject or eValid ...

Applying eValid to Rich Internet Application (RIA) Performance Monitoring.

Which costs more? Groundwork, WebInject or eValid ...

Postby rIsiah » Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:53 pm

Hey, we've got Groundwork and they recommend WebInject...so why should we use eValid, which costs more?
rIsiah
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:28 pm

Re: Which costs more? Groundwork, WebInject or eValid ...

Postby eValid » Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:57 pm

rIsiah wrote:Hey, we've got Groundwork and they recommend WebInject...so why should we use eValid, which costs more?
GroundWork is one of the monitoring environments that we support with eValid RIA monitoring.

It's true that WebInject is one product they recommend, but that approach is entirely HTTP based. By comparison, eValid is browser based.

For a real application which has a real context and involves complex state changes, the HTTP-based method simply does not work. If you have a complex application that alters the state of the browser then eValid is the appropriate test engine. eValid works at the browser level, which is one layer above the HTTP-protocol level.

OK, eValid isn't free. But the stuff that works almost never is!

eValid Support

eValid Monitoring Support
eValid
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:48 pm
Location: USA


Return to Rich Internet Application Monitoring (RIA)

Design Downloaded from free phpBB templates | free website templates | Free Web Buttons