lCharlie wrote:Please list the main technology advantages of eValid?
Happy to.
But we'll keep this to just a very small number of the most important technical differences...otherwise the list would be quite long `8)).
* Being a browser itself, eValid results are inherently accurate and truly client-perspective precise.
* The recording engine is very strong and it is only rarely that a recorded from life script does not play back correctly the first time. (Recordings that do a log-in and fail to record to do the required log-out are one famous exception.)
* The script language is very simple -- yet very powerful.
* The component and whole-page timings and byte-count data is very accurate and highly valuable in tuning up a page.
* Internal playback synchronization processes support AJAX "out of the box". The SyncOnText command does 99% of the AJAX playback sync work, and if that's insufficient there is a family of Validate and Synchronize on DOM element commands available.
* Scripts are highly resilient to inconsequential page changes, a result of the Adaptive Playback feature.
* If a page is known to be dynamic, you can convert a "from life" recording into a structual test that relies not on page specifics, but on the actual organization of the page.
* eValid can be applied to ANY web application on ANY platform type -- desktops, tablets, mobile devices -- to assess performance...
* Licenses for eValid are flexible and economical.
eValid Support
by lCharlie » Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:25 pm